Review
Lacerte Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Worth It?
Our independent Lacerte review for 2026: scoring, pros and cons, pricing, and whether the premium price is worth it for your firm.
July 21, 2026
Independent rankings and reviews for accounting firms
By Dale Hoffman · Published November 12, 2026
For established multi-preparer firms, UltraTax CS is the better choice than Lacerte. UltraTax wins on related-return data sharing, review workflow, and its connected CS Professional Suite. Lacerte is the better choice for small to mid-sized firms with complex work, experienced preparers who value raw input speed, and clients who keep their books in QuickBooks.
Lacerte and UltraTax CS are the two premium desktop suites most firms weigh when their return mix outgrows lighter tools. Both handle complex individual, business, trust, and multi-state returns well, and both are priced like the premium products they are. The difference is where each one puts its strength. Lacerte is built around the fastest data entry in the business. UltraTax is built around a connected firm workflow. We compared them across six criteria that decide the fit.
Intuit's flagship professional tax software for firms with complex individual and business returns.
Read our Lacerte reviewThe tax engine of the Thomson Reuters CS Professional Suite, built for mid-sized and larger firms.
This is Lacerte's signature. Its worksheet-based input is built for speed, and a preparer who knows it well can move through a complicated return faster than in any other suite we have tested. UltraTax is efficient in skilled hands too, but its dense interface does not reach the same pace. The catch is that Lacerte's speed is earned, since the input sheets take real time to master.
UltraTax's data sharing between related returns is a genuine differentiator. Enter information once for a family group or a tiered entity structure and it flows where it needs to go. Lacerte handles each complex return well, but for firms whose clients come in connected groups of individuals, partnerships, and trusts, UltraTax saves more time across the whole relationship.
UltraTax's mature review tools suit firms with a structured preparer and reviewer workflow, and the rest of the CS Professional Suite supports that process with connected document and practice management tools. Lacerte's diagnostics catch a lot before review, but its surrounding firm workflow is less developed. The more preparers and review layers a firm has, the more this matters.
UltraTax sits at the center of the CS Professional Suite, with native connections to document management, practice management, and fixed asset tools, and Thomson Reuters also offers Virtual Office CS for firms that want the vendor to host it. A firm that buys in fully gets returns, source documents, and billing in one connected system. Lacerte is a strong tax engine with a lighter ecosystem around it, so firms assemble more of their workflow from separate products.
Lacerte connects cleanly with QuickBooks, a real advantage for firms whose clients keep their books in the Intuit world. Its large, experienced user base also makes it easier to hire preparers who already know the software and to find answers to unusual questions. UltraTax has a strong following of its own among larger firms, but for a firm hiring experienced help and working with QuickBooks clients, Lacerte has the edge.
Neither suite is the value pick. Lacerte pairs a premium license with per-return fees on many configurations and annual increases that long-time users complain about. UltraTax is modular, quotes are individual, and the total climbs as firms add CS Professional Suite pieces, so the renewal deserves a close look every year. Which one costs less depends on your return volume and how much of each ecosystem you buy, so we score it even.
Both handle complex individual, business, trust, and multi-state returns well. Lacerte gets an expert preparer through a single complicated return faster. UltraTax saves more time across connected returns, such as family groups and tiered entities, because data flows between them. The better choice depends on whether your complexity sits in individual returns or in groups of related ones.
Both are premium suites, and neither publishes one simple price that fits every firm. Lacerte often adds per-return fees on top of its license, while UltraTax prices by module and climbs as you add CS Professional Suite tools. Get written quotes for your actual return volume and configuration, and check how renewals have changed in recent years.
No. Both are desktop software at heart. Intuit offers a hosted option for Lacerte, Thomson Reuters offers Virtual Office CS for UltraTax, and many firms use third-party hosting providers for either one. If you want a suite built for the browser, CCH Axcess Tax is the main alternative.
Neither is quick. Lacerte's worksheet input takes real time to master, especially for staff coming from forms-based software. UltraTax's interface is dense and new staff take a while to get productive. Firms that train many new or seasonal preparers every year should expect a learning curve with either and plan training before busy season.
A small firm with genuinely complex returns and experienced preparers will usually get more from Lacerte, since UltraTax delivers most of its value to firms that adopt the wider CS Professional Suite. A small firm with a mostly simple book should look at Drake Tax or ProSeries first. See our ranking of the best tax software for small firms.
Review
Our independent Lacerte review for 2026: scoring, pros and cons, pricing, and whether the premium price is worth it for your firm.
July 21, 2026
Ranking
We ranked the top professional tax software for CPA firms in 2026. See scores, pros and cons, and which suite fits your practice.
February 13, 2026
Ranking
We ranked the best cloud hosting providers for UltraTax CS in 2026. See scores, pros and cons, and which host fits a firm running the full CS Professional Suite.
July 30, 2026